Paul Cowan

Nomadic cattle rustler and inventor of the electric lasso

Ember.js Routing - the Director’s Cut

WARN: This article is now out of date. Check this post for a more up to date article on ember routing.

I’ve had a number of requests to update this post which discussed a solution to the lack of routing at that time of writing in ember. This solution used an addon called the ember-routemanager from Gordon Hempton.

A lot in Ember has changed since that post and Ember now has its own full blown routing solution that is not a million miles away from the route manager I blogged about. I believe Gordon Hempton who created the original ember-routemanager is now an ember core member which might explain the stark similarities.

Enough of the old and on with the New

The new ember router has been on the master branch for a while now and it is an emerging pattern that is prone to change and indeed has changed quite a bit in its short existence. The ember routing solution is one of the main reasons I am drawn to ember and it differs greatly from anything else out there in the javascript mv* space.

The Ember router extends the very elegant ember statemanager:

Ember.Router = Ember.StateManager.extend({

The basic premise of the ember routing solution is that you describe your application as a hierarchical tree of objects - one object per conceptual state (Ember.Route extends Ember.State):

  • On line 1 we create a subclass of the Ember.Router and assign the reference to a property named Router of the Ember application object which in this example is named WZ. Naming the property Router is a convention you must adhere to.
  • Line 2 tells the Ember.Router to log state transitions to the console.
  • Line 3 sets the location property of the Router to hash which means that url fragment identifiers like #/post/1 will be parsed for matches in the routing hierarchy. You can also specify a value of history which will use the browser’s pushstate api if one exists.
  • On line 4, a root route is created. As the name root suggests, all other routes (or states as I still think of them) will be either direct children of the root route or grandchildren of the root route. The root route acts as the container for the set of routable states but is not routable itself.
  • On line 5 and line 8 are two such child routes or states of the root route named index and home respectively.
  • Leaf routes in the routing hierarchy can have a route property describing the URL pattern you would like to detect.
  • On line 6, the index route has a route property with a value of ‘/’ which is what the url will be when the application first loads.
  • On line 9, the home route has a route property of /home.
  • On line 10 is the connectOutlets method that you can override in each child route and provide a mechanism for rendering content onto the page as the url changes. More on this later.

When an Ember application loads, Ember will parse the URL and attempt to find an Ember.Route within the Router’s child route hierarchy that matches the url. Loading the page at ‘/’ which is what the url is when the application is first initialised, will first of all transition the router to the first route named root and then to the subsate or child route where the router can find a match on the url. In this case, the router will find a match on the route property of the index route and will transition to that route. The index route in the above example simply redirects to the home route via the redirectsTo directive on line 7 of the above gist.

Loading the page at the url #/home will transition the router to a substate or route at a path or place in the hierarchy of root.home. This path syntax is useful for testing and what it translates to is that we are currently at the home route which is a child of the root route.

Below is a test that verifies a root url of ‘/’ will transition to the home route:

  • On line 7, the route method of the router is called and a url fragment is passed as an argument for the router to try and match on.
  • Line 8 asserts that we have transitioned to the expected home route which is a direct descendant of the root route or state. We verify this by checking the currentState.path of the router which uses the dot syntax to signify where we are in the router hierarchy.

Nested Routes

As you would expect, nested routes correspond to fragments of the url. Below is a direct descendant of the root route named vault which has a path of root.vault:

In the above example, the vault route has a route of /vault, as well as a child state of new which in turn has a child state named step1. If a url of /vault/new/step1 is requested, all three of these routes will be composed together and all 3 states or routes will be executed in sequence. Each connectOutlets method on each state or route will be executed, giving you a chance to change what is displayed on the page as the url changes and the application state changes.

Below is a test that verifies a url of /vault/new/step1 transitions to the correct state:

State transitions and View Changes

As each url change transitions the router or statemachine from state to state or route to route, so you would expect what is rendered onto the screen to change also. Each nested route can take responsibility for what is rendered onto the screen:

Below is the vault route and its child states

And below is a screen grab that outlines which parts of the page are rendered by which route whenever a page is rendered at the following url #/vault/new/step1 If the url changes to #/vault/new/step2 then only the bottom segment of the page will be changed when the step2 route is transitioned to.


So how is this beautiful tapestry of nested views stitched together? How do router transitions marry themselves to view changes? Well, the observant amongst you will have noticed a method named connectOutlets that appears in all of the leaf routes (non-root route) of the router.

In order to illustrate how this works, I am going to first refresh our memory of what the router itself looks like:

As explained earlier, the router will parse the url and try and find a match on the route property of one of the router’s child routes or states. When the application first loads or a url of ‘/’ is requested and a route will be found on the index route which redirects to the home route.

On line 10 of the above, we come to the now infamous connectOutlets method (lines 10 - 13 of the above gist).

Ember provides some nice conventions that are tied to routing. The connectOutlets method will be called when a state or route has been entered and gives the developer an opportunity to reflect the change in application state by injecting content into the place holder of a client side template which is named an outlet.

connectOutlets works by assigning Ember controller/view pairs, that follow the convention xxxxController and xxxxView and assigning them to named placeholders called outlets that are found in handlebars templates.

When you create and initialize a new Ember application object (more on this later), you must have a controller named ApplicationController and a view named ApplicationView or Ember will throw an exception. These two objects will form our first controller/view pair that conforms to the xxxxController and xxxxView convention. What is rendered from the xxxxView will be placed in the outlet or handlebars placeholder.

Below is my ApplicationController from this sample app:

WZ.ApplicationController = Em.Controller.extend()

And below is my ApplicationView from this sample app:

WZ.ApplicationView = Em.View.extend
  templateName: 'app/templates/application'

With these in place, Ember will render the template that is specified at the templateName property in the view above. Below is the template that can be found at the path of the templateName property above:

Pretty sparse, huh? All that the above template contains are two outlets, one outlet named nav and one default outlet. Outlets can be thought of as place holders that you can inject content into. The connectOutlets method on each child route is the place to connect up these outlets with corresponding Ember view and controller pairs.

Below is a refresh of the connectOutlets method for the /home route:

The first outlet we connect is the named nav outlet (line 4 of the above gist). The first thing to note on line 4 is that we are accessing the controller via the router with the following syntax:

router.get('applicationController').connectOutlet 'nav', 'navbar'

Ember has made the wise choice to move away from accessing objects with the path syntax that was popularised in earlier ember applications when you might have accessed the application controller like this:


And instead objects ending in Controller are detected and are assigned as properties of the router when an Ember application is initialized like below:

window.WZ = Ember.Application.create()

This means we can pull the controller instances from the router and call the controller’s connectOutlet method to inject content into the outlet placeholders that are specified in the handlebars template. connectOutlet creates a new instance of the provided view class, wires it up with its associated controller, and assigns the new view instance to a property on the current controller.

What this translates to, is that if we call connectOutlet like this

router.get('applicationController').connectOutlet 'nav', 'navbar'

We are telling ember to connect the outlet that is named nav and that we want to create a new instance of a view called NavbarView and wire it up with a controller named NavbarController.

The following line from the above gist calls the controller’s connectOutlet method and only passes in one argument:

router.get('applicationController').connectOutlet 'home'

This tells ember to connect the outlet with no name with a view called HomeView and wire it up with a controller called HomeController.

The HomeView view that was instanciated from the connectOutlet above method points to a handlebars template that contains a named outlet that we can hook up with the following line:

router.get('homeController').connectOutlet 'bottombar', 'bottombar'

The above line grabs a reference to the homeController object via the router, and then call connectOutlet which will connect an outlet named bottombar with a controller/view pair named BottombarView and BottombarController. And so we could go on into finer more maintainable detail

And this is what the page looks like in the browser and which section belongs to which outlet. I hope you can see that this is a very elegant solution to weaving a rich and maintainable UI from your handlebars templates.

One last thing to mention is that you can supply a content for the controller by supplying a final argument for the connectOutlet method like this:

On line 4 of the above gist, we are retrieving an array of objects from the remote store and passing that into the connectOutlet method as the last argument. The content will be assigned to the controller.


I am blown away by the elegance of this routing solution and it is the best out there bar none in the javascript mv* space.

I besiege you to get the latest ember from github and take the plunge, you will not regret it.

All the code that is used in these blog posts can be found at this github repo.

Please feel free to add any comments below.